Early Claim: It’s easy to
dismiss Sherman Alexie’s story as offensive and pointless. But it seems like
his unique narrative style humanizes his characters in a way that
would be impossible were they just flat
stereotypes.
Ideas to further unpack (in bold from above):
1) “unique
narrative style.”
2) “humanizes
his characters.”
3) “flat
stereotypes.”
Light Text-Exploration:
Julius
and his friends pass by. Victor and Adrian sit on Victor’s porch talking and reminiscing
about Julius and their own basketball experiences.
“There’s a definite history1 of reservation heroes2 who never finish high school, who never finish basketball seasons. Hell, there’s been one or two guys who played just a few minutes of one game, just enough to show what they could have been3. And there’s the famous case of Silas Sirius, who made one move and scored one basket in his entire basketball career. People still talk about it4.”
-page 47
They continue to talk about Silas Sirius.
“There’s a definite history1 of reservation heroes2 who never finish high school, who never finish basketball seasons. Hell, there’s been one or two guys who played just a few minutes of one game, just enough to show what they could have been3. And there’s the famous case of Silas Sirius, who made one move and scored one basket in his entire basketball career. People still talk about it4.”
-page 47
They continue to talk about Silas Sirius.
1. Alexie
does something interesting here–he has his main character almost embrace the
stereotype, in a way that reveals that he’s hyper aware of it. When Victor
describes how there’s a “definite history of reservation heroes who never
finish high school,” he speaks as if he understands that this is a common track
for reservation Indians to take. At the same time, however, he acknowledges
that there are exceptions to this
fate, so he’s both showing his understanding of the stereotype but also making
sure to note that it’s not always true.
2. The
definition of a “hero” is a brave person that is recognized and idealized for courage
and outstanding achievements. This shows how Alexie humanizes his characters by
showing how on reservations–just like everywhere else in the world–there are
heroes: there are brave people who have courage and determination. This knocks
down stereotypes of reservation Indians being very underachieved and unaccomplished.
3. “What
they could have been:” could have has
the intonation of being very passive, almost lazy. This is a recurring pattern
we see with the characters in this story–two men who just sit around all day,
waiting for something to happen; people using alcohol as an escape from
reality. However, this seems to greatly encompass the stereotype of reservation
Indians being very complacent and lethargic–but just because it stems from a
stereotype, does that mean it’s untruthful? What is Alexie trying to do here?
Is he admitting to a stereotype or trying to show that this one is truthful?
4. This
bit dives away from a stereotype by showing how reservation Indians do have a
sense of community, do support each other, do get excited when one of their
comrades succeeds. Although that isn’t quite what’s being shown in this
particular part of the story, we do see this sense of pride and optimism when
we see Victor hoping that Julius does
make it. The natural feelings that communities of people have and share are
often discounted and ignored when looking at the lives of reservation Indians, because
we throw so many labels onto them that we forget the fact that they’re people
too! And that they have human feelings just like we do!
No comments:
Post a Comment